there's a distinction between "corporate rock" where a label creates a character, and an experiment where the artist creates a character. How is Steev Mike = Andrew WK any different than say Daniel Dumile = MF Doom? Or David Bowie = Ziggy Stardust? (or Garth Brooks = Chris Gaines?)

'cos Bowie was whacked out of his gourd on coke and didn't know who he was himself half the time ;)

Because W.K. didn't create his character; that's the whole point. He even admitted in an interview that he's an actor playing the part, that he replaced the original W.K. That much is true, it was on rockfeedback.com..... but then later he was like THAT WAS ALL OUT OF CONTEXT blah blah blah...

Just woke up from a bad nightmare. I dreamed partying didn't exist and so I didn't exist either. 12:07 AM Jul 20th via txt

yeah but he said he was part of it. There was like a group of people, including his dad who's a professor who created the character. He was actively part of the creation.

"Party Tip of the Day: When the going gets tough, the tough get a party going."

hey guys, Bud Light or Coors Light? I keep flipflopping lately. I like the Coors cans better. They seem to stay colder longer. But Bud is even more drinkable (since it seems more watered down).

Oh, I remember hearing a bit of that on the radio actually, and if my ears could've done a double-take, they would've.

Bud has more alcohol in it.

Coors Light all the way. You can't go wrong with the silver bullets.

is this a fact? I feel like it should be the other way?

yeah um the Piazelli Group or something like that? I think the disc is called Session One ? Anyway it's good. He also did a disc of piano solos.

Nope, they're the same, don't know why I always thought that.

http://www.realbeer.com/edu/health/calories.php

psychosomatic.